Which method can be used to evaluate the quality of CPR provided by the BLS team?

Evaluating the quality of CPR performed by a BLS team is essential for improving outcomes in cardiac arrest situations. Each of the methods listed plays a vital role in assessing and ensuring effective CPR delivery.

Visual observation allows team members to monitor the timing and effectiveness of chest compressions. It provides an immediate way to assess techniques, such as the rate and depth of compressions, and can highlight issues such as interruptions in compressions.

Using a feedback device that measures compression depth is critical for ensuring that the compressions are not only being delivered at the correct rate but also with adequate depth. Research shows that effective chest compressions should be at least 2 inches deep in adults, and these devices help provide real-time feedback to achieve this goal.

The chest compression fraction represents the percentage of time that compressions are delivered during a cardiac arrest. A higher compression fraction is associated with better chances of survival, as it indicates minimal interruptions. Evaluating this metric allows teams to strive for continuous, high-quality chest compressions.

Since all three methods contribute valuable insights into the effectiveness of CPR practices, opting for a comprehensive approach to evaluate the quality of CPR ensures that BLS teams can make informed adjustments and enhance the overall effectiveness of their life-saving efforts.